Abstract
AbstractInternational comparison of welfare states offers a way for understanding how welfare states have contributed to the constitution of life course transitions and the different ways in which they are being shaped. The chapter introduces the concept of “transition regimes”, a comparative model developed with regard to school-to-work-transitions. The aim is to question if and to what extent this model can contribute to the objectives of reflexive transition research that extends the research of how individual transitions progress to how they are constantly re-constituted. In detail, this implies relating the analysis of comprehensive constellations with the discursive, institutional and individual practices involved in doing transitions. The chapter starts with an overview of international studies of school-to-work-transitions. This is followed by a review of comparative welfare research and the introduction of the concept of transition regimes, which is then related to the concept of doing transitions. The conclusion explores the contribution of comparative analysis of transition regimes for reflexive transition research.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference70 articles.
1. Alheit, P., & Dausien, B. (2002). Biographicity as basic resource of lifelong learning. In P. Alheit, J. Beck, E. Kammler, R. Taylor, & H. Salling Olesen (Eds.), Lifelong learning inside and outside schools (Vol. 2, pp. 400–423). RUC.
2. Allmendinger, J. (1989). Educational systems and labor market outcomes. European Sociological Review, 5(3), 231–250.
3. Allmendinger, J., & Leibfried, S. (2003). Education and the welfare state: Four worlds of competence production. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(1), 63–81.
4. Bacchi, C., & Bonham, J. (2014). Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications. Foucault Studies. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i17.4298
5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Polity Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献