Author:
Grassini Simone,Ratcliffe Eleanor
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter considers the potential of virtual reality (VR) technology in fostering mental well-being and raising environmental consciousness. As urbanisation leads to a decline in green spaces, VR emerges as a solution by simulating natural environments, providing an innovative approach to health and well-being. The chapter investigates the capacity of VR to evoke emotional responses thus potentially promoting prosocial behaviour and effective environmental communication. It also examines how VR can help frame environmental messages and the need for more empirical research to understand the effects of message framing on pro-environmental behaviour. Furthermore, the chapter considers the psychological benefits of VR nature experiences and the rise of virtual reality tourism as a sustainable alternative to traditional tourism, which often contributes to environmental degradation due to associated economic activities. Despite facing challenges and limitations such as lack of standardisation and varying user acceptance, VR technology holds promise in the fields of environmental education and nature-based health promotion, meriting further exploration and research.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference131 articles.
1. Abdul Rahman, N., Mohamad, A., Ahmad, M., & Yusof, A. (2020). Acceptability of Virtual Reality among Older People. In Proceedings of International Conference on HCI for Cybersecurity Privacy & Trust HCICPT 2020: HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Human Aspects in Cybersecurity Privacy & Trust (pp. 3–15).
2. Addis, C., & Kutar, M. (2018, March). The general data protection regulation (GDPR), emerging technologies and UK organisations: Awareness, implementation and readiness. In UK Academy for Information Systems Conference Proceedings 2018 (p. 29). UKAIS–UK Academy for Information Systems.
3. Ahn, S. J., & G., Bailenson, J. & Dooyeon Park. (2014). Short- and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.014
4. Ahn, S. J., & G., Bostick, J., Ogle, E., Nowak, K., McGillicuddy, K. & Bailenson, J. (2016). Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12172
5. Anderson, K., & Bows, A. (2011). Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: Emission scenarios for a new world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1934), 20–44. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0290