Author:
Anderson Colin Ray,Bruil Janneke,Chappell M. Jahi,Kiss Csilla,Pimbert Michel Patrick
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter discusses a seemingly obvious but often underappreciated reality—without secure land tenure as well as access to and control over other elements of natural ecosystems, agroecology specifically, and the sustainable livelihoods of food producers more generally, will be impossible. We review how the access and control over water, ecosystem, cultivated biodiversity, seeds, breeds and soil amongst other aspects of nature enable agroecology. Conversely, we review the disabling conditions in this domain where inadequate and insecure access and tenure rights for various elements of natural ecosystems increase vulnerability, hunger and poverty and undermine agroecology. Insecure rights and access to nature provides little incentive for farmers, communities and territorial networks to invest in long-term agroecological approaches.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference53 articles.
1. Araghi, F. (2008). The Invisible Hand and the Visible Foot: Peasants, Dispossession and Globalization. In A. H. A.-L. C. Kay (Ed.), Peasants and Globalisation: Political Economy, Rural Transformation and the Agrarian Question (pp. 111–147). London: Routledge.
2. Borras, S. M., Jr. (2007). Pro-poor Land Reform: A Critique. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
3. Brisbois, M. C., & de Loë, R. C. (2016). Power in Collaborative Approaches to Governance for Water: A Systematic Review. Society & Natural Resources, 29(7), 775–790.
4. Brun, L. (2018). Landgrabbing Threatens Agroecology in Senegal. Farming Matters.
5. Chappell, M. J., Wittman, H., Bacon, C. M., Ferguson, B. G., Barrios, L. G., Barrios, R. G., et al. (2013). Food Sovereignty: An Alternative Paradigm for Poverty Reduction and Biodiversity Conservation in Latin America. F1000Res, 2, 235.