Beyond the Paradox of Trust and Digital Platforms: Populism and the Reshaping of Internet Regulations

Author:

Flew Terry

Abstract

AbstractOne of the paradoxes of the misinformation and ‘fake news’ debates are that they require a greater degree of trust in media, digital platforms and governments in order to combat conspiracy theories, when in fact distrust of media, digital platforms and governments is part of a wider crisis of trust in institutions and expertise. This suggests that we need a more sophisticated analysis of the politics of expertise and how they intersect with both policies towards digital platforms and shifts in the political sphere. Drawing upon the work of Thomas Piketty on shifts in electoral politics, and Pippa Norris on the rise of populism, it is argued that debates about tech policy are largely played out between educated elites from ‘liberal’ and ‘cosmopolitan’ perspectives, which leaves them open to populist critique. One of the reasons why there are greater calls to regulate digital platforms is the rise of political populism, which can leave digital activists in a political bind: they favour measures to rein in the power of ‘Big Tech’ in principle, but are very wary of any measures perceived to increase the power of nation states with regards to the Internet.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference110 articles.

1. 20 Years of Trust. https://www.edelman.com/20yearsoftrust/?fbclid=IwAR12VvWYTk8IaqQ28CihjW_Z7a8_FfSWhUfzibgnVCxLJNLbL59PejxzqK4#01-intro

2. Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1996). The californian ideology. Science as Culture, 6(1), 44–72.

3. Bell, E. (2018). The Dependent Press: How Silicon Valley Threatens Independent Journalism. In Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, ands Apple (pp. 241–261). Oxford University press.

4. Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford University Press.

5. Berg, C. (2020, September 10). Australia’s Confused Tech Regulators Are Cracking Down on regulators-are-cracking-down-on-google-for-using-links https://reason.com/2020/09/10/australias-confused-tech

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Epistemic Rights and Digital Communications Policies: Collective Rights and Digital Citizenship;Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3