Epistemic Rights and Digital Communications Policies: Collective Rights and Digital Citizenship

Author:

Flew Terry

Abstract

AbstractThe concept of ‘epistemic rights’ marks an important conceptual shift in thinking about the politics of digital technologies, going beyond such framings as digital inclusion, digital rights, and the digital divide. It observes that epistemic rights are associated with a universalist conception of digital rights that promotes access and use of digital technologies among under-served communities and a nation-building agenda for digital policy. This can be contrasted to an individualistic conception of digital rights, which focuses upon the need for to protect citizens from over-reach by the nation-state. The latter has historically had a strong influence over technology policies than the first, due to the role of ‘internet imaginaries’ developed in the 1990s, that view the internet in terms of the triumph of individualism over collectivism. Drawing upon the recent work of Thomas Piketty and his collaborators, this chapter will focus upon the last of these as a factor in the political tensions that exist in technology policy discourses, particularly as nation-state regulation of the internet and digital platform companies becomes more widespread. It will consider the extent to which a discourse framed around epistemic rights could bring together new political coalitions around technology policy that can cross the divide between technocratic decision-making and populist politics.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference61 articles.

1. Associated Press. (2022, September 16). Court rules in favor of Texas law allowing lawsuits against social media companies. NPR News. https://www.npr.org/2022/09/16/1123620521/fifth-circuit-texas-social-media-ruling

2. Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian ideology. Science as Culture, 6(1), 44–72.

3. Bennett, T. (1992). Outside literature. Routledge.

4. Bossio, D., Meese, J., Flew, T., Leaver, T., & Barnet, B. (2022). Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code and the global turn toward platform regulation. Policy and Internet, 14(1), 136–150.

5. Bowers, J., & Zittrain, J. (2020). Answering impossible questions: Content governance in an age of disinformation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(1), 1–8.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3