Trade-Offs and Challenges of Serverless Data Analytics
Author:
García-López Pedro,Sánchez-Artigas Marc,Shillaker Simon,Pietzuch Peter,Breitgand David,Vernik Gil,Sutra Pierre,Tarrant Tristan,Juan-Ferrer Ana,París Gerard
Abstract
AbstractServerless computing has become very popular today since it largely simplifies cloud programming. Developers do no longer need to worry about provisioning or operating servers, and they have to pay only for the compute resources used when their code is run. This new cloud paradigm suits well for many applications, and researchers have already begun investigating the feasibility of serverless computing for data analytics. Unfortunately, today’s serverless computing presents important limitations that make it really difficult to support all sorts of analytics workloads. This chapter first starts by analyzing three fundamental trade-offs of today’s serverless computing model and their relationship with data analytics. It studies how by relaxing disaggregation, isolation, and simple scheduling, it is possible to increase the overall computing performance, but at the expense of essential aspects of the model such as elasticity, security, or sub-second activations, respectively. The consequence of these trade-offs is that analytics applications may well end up embracing hybrid systems composed of serverless and serverful components, which we call ServerMix in this chapter. We will review the existing related work to show that most applications can be actually categorized as ServerMix.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference37 articles.
1. Akkus, I. E., Chen, R., Rimac, I., Stein, M., Satzke, K., Beck, A., Aditya, P., & Hilt, V. (2018). SAND: Towards high-performance serverless computing. In 2018 USENIX annual technical conference (ATC’18), (pp. 923–935). 2. Al-Ali, Z., Goodarzy, S., Hunter, E., Ha, S., Han, R., Keller, E., & Rozner, E. (2018). Making serverless computing more serverless. In IEEE 11th international conference on cloud computing (CLOUD’18), (pp. 456–459). 3. Amazon: AWS lambda limits (2019). https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/limits.html/ 4. Attiya, H., & Welch, J. L. (1991). Sequential consistency versus linearizability (extended abstract). In Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on parallel algorithms and architectures (SPAA ’91), (pp. 304–315). 5. Barcelona-Pons, D., Sánchez-Artigas, M., París, G., Sutra, P., & García-López, P. (2019). On the faas track: Building stateful distributed applications with serverless architectures. In Proceedings of the 20th international middleware conference (pp. 41–54).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|