Modernization, Democracy, and Judicial Governance

Author:

Castillo-Ortiz Pablo

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter puts the relationship between judicial governance and democratic quality in context. Using modernization theory the chapter hypothesises that the negative correlation found earlier in this book between the existence of judicial councils and democratic quality is a result of an omitted variable bias: that omitted variable is modernization. Using robust regressions, the chapter shows that, in general, variations in the design of judicial governance have no significant effect on the quality of democracy in European countries.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference14 articles.

1. Bobek M, Kosar D (2014) Global solutions, local damages: a critical study in judicial councils in central and Eastern Europe. Ger Law J 15:1257–1292

2. Bunjevac T (2017) From individual judge to judicial bureaucracy: the emergence of judicial councils and the changing nature of judicial accountability in court administration. Univ New South Wales Law J 40:806–841

3. Castillo-Ortiz P (2019) The politics of implementation of the judicial council model in Europe. Eur Polit Sci Rev 11:503–520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000298

4. Coppedge M, Gerring J, Knutsen CH, et al (2021) V-Dem Codebook v.11.1

5. Elkins Z, Ginsburg T (2021) Characteristics of National Constitutions, Version 3.0

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3