Author:
Yeravdekar Vidya,Kapur Nidhi Piplani
Abstract
AbstractThe pandemic has forced all educational institutions to grapple with challenges. Throughout this time Symbiosis International University (SIU) in India has been proactive in leading change not only at the university but also in K-12 schools. While the university transitioned to virtual teaching and learning, a methodical approach was laid out in assisting its eight elementary and senior secondary schools in both urban and rural areas, through the Symbiosis Schools Central Directorate (SSCD), to adapt to the needs of a public health crisis. While connectivity challenges continue to haunt schools, especially in rural areas, training and capacity building of K-12 teachers and administrators by university professors and experts has been a saving grace in navigating the pandemic.The focus of this case is understanding the parallels and the partnership between SIU and its K-12 schools. It reflects a bottom-up approach in dealing with the pandemic where Symbiosis Society, the non-profit organization that has established the schools as well as the University, invested in teacher capacity building at its elementary and secondary schools through its Symbiosis Schools Central Directorate (SSCD) in both rural and urban areas to ensure continuity of teaching and learning while adapting to this new normal. The investment in teacher capacity building has enabled the leadership to address the emerging circumstances, stimulate momentum to create or demand needed change at their institutions, inspire peer learning, and foster innovation in strategy and practice for the greater benefit of its stakeholders including students and parents.This case study reflects on SIU experiences in dealing with the dynamic circumstances such as training and capacity building with respect to supporting teachers in developing skills to adapt their content to virtual mode, blended learning, and integrating Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) into the curriculum. In addition, SIU had to counsel students and parents to adapt to this new way of learning. SIU’s experience encompasses a coordinated approach of working with internal and external stakeholders to develop a response to the crisis, short-to-medium-term strategic planning in the face of uncertainty, exploring technology solutions, partnership management, and effective communication processes with its stakeholders. Special emphasis has been put on ensuring the mental and physical wellbeing of the learner, constant communication and guidance to parents, and virtual activities to promote community engagement to mitigate the loss of physical social interactions at this crucial time.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference6 articles.
1. Chen, I. (2011). Instructional design methodologies. In Information Resource Management Association (Ed.), Instructional design: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 80–94). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-503-2.ch108
2. Karen S. C. Thomas (2019). Handbook of research on critical thinking and teacher education pedagogy (pp. 255–276).
3. Hayden Wimmer, Loreen Powell, Lawrence Kilgus and Christina Force (2017). International journal of online pedagogy and course design (pp. 1–19).
4. Jamie Mahoney, Carol A. Hall (2020). Exploring online learning through synchronous and asynchronous instructional methods (pp. 52–76).
5. Middlebrook, G. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous modalities. In B. L. Hewett & D. P. K. Eric (Eds.), Foundational practices in online writing instruction (pp. 129–148). Perspectives on Writing, The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献