Author:
Anand Geetika,Dutta Nandini
Abstract
AbstractThe appropriateness of planning programmes in the Global South, heavily influenced by their colonial pasts and the content developed and taught in universities of the Global North, has been widely questioned. In recent years, contemporary urban challenges, as also highlightedNational Institute of Urban Affairs by the New Urban Agenda, demand that planning education step up and be a core lever of urban transformation. Grappling with legacies from the colonial past on one hand, and looking towards achieving sustainable change in future, where does planning education in post-colonial contexts currently stand? Taking seriously the intent of the programmes, this paper asks two interrelated questions of ten Master’s level planning programmes across Africa and Asia: Who is the programme intended for, and to what end? What are the various forms of knowledge the programme intends to impart, and how? This comparative, qualitative review of planning programmes from across the two regions highlights the similarities and variations in how planning and its education are viewed and approached by different institutions. With the planning discipline currently in a state of flux in post-colonial contexts, this discussion presents an opportunity for learning and innovation through South-South exchanges and partnerships—a critical, yet under-explored area for collaboration when compared with existing North–South knowledge exchange partnerships.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference59 articles.
1. Adamson B, Morris P (2014) Comparing curricula. In Bray M, Adamson B, Mason M (ed) Comparative education research. Springer International Publishing, pp 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05594-7_11
2. Ali AK, Doan PL (2006) A survey of undergraduate course syllabi and a hybrid course on global urban topics. J Plan Educ Res 26(2):222–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X06291500
3. AUB (American University of Beirut) (2018) Graduate Catalog 2018–19, Department of Architecture, pp 328–329. Available from https://www.aub.edu.lb/Registrar/Documents/catalogue/graduate18-19/architecture-mupp-mud.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2020
4. Blair N, Manda M (2016) A partnership-based model for embedding employability in urban planning education. In: Urban, planning and transport research 4. Routledge, pp 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2016.1145070
5. Bray M, Adamson B, Mason M (2014) Comparative education research: approaches and methods. Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献