Author:
Kyriakides Leonidas,Panayiotou Anastasia
Abstract
AbstractThe chapter discusses the need of using a theory-driven and evidence-based approach for teaching improvement purposes and argues that the dynamic model of educational effectiveness may be used for establishing links between educational effectiveness research and research on teaching improvement. In the first part of the chapter the main elements of the dynamic model are presented with an emphasis at the factors operating at classroom level and their measurement dimensions. The first part also provides an overview of national and international studies conducted to test the validity of the dynamic model at classroom level. These empirical studies have provided support for the importance of factors included in the dynamic model (such as application, modelling, student assessment etc.), with regard to their effects on student learning outcomes. Empirical studies have also revealed relationships among factors operating at the classroom level, which help us define stages of effective teaching. Therefore, in the second part of the chapter, we discuss ways of using the dynamic model for teaching improvement purposes. In this context, the rationale and main steps of the dynamic approach (DA) to teaching improvement are presented. In the final section, we provide a critical review of studies investigating the impact of the DA on improving teaching skills and promoting student learning outcomes and draw implications for research, policy, and practice.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference65 articles.
1. Antoniou, P. (2013). A longitudinal study investigating relations between stages of effective teaching, teaching experience, and teacher professional development approaches. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 48(2), 25–40.
2. Antoniou, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2011). The impact of a dynamic approach to professional development on teacher instruction and student learning: Results from an experimental study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2011.577078
3. Antoniou, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2013). A dynamic integrated approach to teacher professional development: Impact and sustainability of the effects on improving teacher behavior and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.001
4. Aparicio, J. J., & Moneo, M. R. (2005). Constructivism, the so-called semantic learning theories, and situated cognition versus the psychological learning theories. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600005060
5. Azigwe, J. B., Kyriakides, L., Panayiotou, A., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2016). The impact of effective teaching characteristics in promoting student achievement in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.07.004
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献