Author:
Looker Benjamin,Kington Alison,Hibbert-Mayne Kimberley,Blackmore Karen,Buckler Scott
Abstract
AbstractEffective teaching behaviour is known to be associated with positive pupil outcomes. As such, it is considered an important aspect of educational research. In this chapter, we used validated instruments to measure two types of teaching effectiveness. Teachers’ perceived effective teaching behaviour was measured using the Teacher as Social Context (TASC) questionnaire and teachers’ observed effective teaching behaviour were measured using the International Comparative Analysis of Learning and Teaching (ICALT) Observation Instrument. Statistical comparisons were made between these two measures and were additionally analysed through the lens of teachers’ career phases. The study found that there are significant differences in teachers’ perceived and observed effective teaching behaviour. Teachers’ perceived effective teaching behaviour was found to remain relatively stable throughout their careers, however, their observed effectiveness was seen to change considerably. As teachers enter the middle phases of their careers, an increase in observed effectiveness was identified, followed by a decline during the later career phases. Further analysis of observed effective teaching behaviour using six ICALT domains indicates that the way a teacher facilitates a safe and stimulating learning climate and is efficiently organised plays an important role in the variation of their observed effectiveness. These results have implications for the continued professional development of trainee teachers and qualified teachers at all stages of their careers.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference51 articles.
1. Aloe, A., Amo, L., & Shanahan, M. (2014). Classroom management self-efficacy and burnout: A multivariate meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 101–126.
2. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
3. Baker, E., Barton, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H., & Linn, R. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers [Press release]. https://www.epi.org/publication/bp278/
4. Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.
5. Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Open University Press.