Author:
Helkkula Anu,Arnould Eric
Abstract
AbstractShelby V. Hunt was long interested in codifying and parameterizing the marketing discipline with a distinctive focus on the principles of making scientific claims. In their article, Hunt et al., (2022, in this issue) present their concerns about the scholarly status of marketing, highlighting the loss of a central, mainstream research focus. However, we think the real challenges are different than those that worry the authors. Marketing as a scientific discipline evolves by adapting from and contributing to theories, concepts, and methods in related research fields. Thus, we claim that the potential of marketing discipline lies in the diversity of intertwined and divergent research streams, such as service-dominant logic and consumer culture theory. We propose that a cocreational approach that questions foundational assumptions and a purely managerial orientation, is more likely to produce a renewal of marketing scholarship and provide solutions to wicked social problems than a single reductive theoretical approach.
Funder
Hanken School of Economics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Akaka, M. A., Koskela-Huotari, K., & Vargo, S. L. (2021). Formalizing service-dominant logic as a general theory of markets: Taking stock and moving forward. AMS Review, 11(3–4), 375–389.
2. Anderson, P. F. (1983). Marketing, scientific progress, and scientific method. Journal of Marketing, 43(Fall), 18–31.
3. Arnould, E. J. (2022). Ontology and circulation: towards an eco-economy of persons. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(February), 71–97.
4. Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (Eds.). (2018). Consumer Culture Theory. London and New York: Sage Publications.
5. Bádéjọ, F. A., & Gordon, R. (2022). See finish! Scunnered!! A vernacular critique of hierarchies of knowledge in marketing. Marketing Theory, 22(June), 229–249.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献