Abstract
AbstractRetention is important for statistical power and external validity in long-term cohort studies. The aims of our study were to evaluate different retention strategies within a cohort study of adults of Turkish descent in Berlin, Germany, and to compare participants and non-participants. In 2011–2012, a population-based study was conducted among adults of Turkish descent to primarily examine recruitment strategies. 6 years later, the participants were re-contacted and invited to complete a self-report questionnaire regarding their health status, health care utilization, and satisfaction with medical services. The retention strategy comprised letters in both German and Turkish, phone calls, and home visits (by bilingual staff). We calculated the response rate and retention rate, using definitions of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, as well as the relative retention rate for each level of contact. Associations of baseline recruitment strategy, sociodemographic, migration-related and health-related factors with retention were investigated by logistic regression analysis. Of 557 persons contacted, 249 (44.7%) completed the questionnaire. This was 50.1% of those whose contact information was available. The relative retention rate was lowest for phone calls (8.9%) and highest for home visits (18.4%). Participants were more often non-smokers and German citizens than non-participants. For all remaining factors, no association with retention was found. In this study, among adults of Turkish descent, the retention rate increased considerably with every additional level of contact. Implementation of comprehensive retention strategies provided by culturally matched study personnel may lead to higher validity and statistical power in studies on migrant health issues.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology
Reference40 articles.
1. Barry AE. How attrition impacts the internal and external validity of longitudinal research. J Sch Health. 2005;75:267–70.
2. Twisk J, de Vente W. Attrition in longitudinal studies: How to deal with missing data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:329–37.
3. Edwards PJ, Clarke MJ, Roberts I, DiGuiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires (Review). Cochrane Libr. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4/abstract.
4. Booker CL, Harding S, Benzeval M. A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–2.
5. Hernando C, Sabidó M, Ronda E, Ortiz-Barreda G, Casabona J. A systematic review of longitudinal cohort studies on the health of migrant populations. Soc Med. 2015;9:73–85.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献