Author:
Merz Sibille,Jaehn Philipp,Pischon Tobias,Fischer Beate,Wirkner Kerstin,Rach Stefan,Guenther Kathrin,Obi Nadia,Holmberg Christine,Bolte Gabriele,Mena Emily,Rommel Alexander,Saß Anke-Christine,Pöge Kathleen,Strasser Sarah,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Increasing evidence suggests that participation proportions in longitudinal health research vary according to sex/gender, age, social class, or migration status. Intersectionality scholarship purports that such social categories cannot be understood in isolation and makes visible the co-dependent nature of the social determinants of health and illness. This paper uses an intersectionality-informed approach in order to expand the understanding of why people participate in health research, and the impact of intersecting social structures and experiences on these attitudes.
Methods
A sample of 80 respondents who had previously either accepted or declined an invitation to participate in the German National Cohort (NAKO) participated in our interview study. Interviews were semi-structured and contained both narrative elements and more structured probes. Data analysis proceeded in two steps: first, the entire data set was analysed thematically (separately for participants and non-participants); second, key themes were compared across self-reported sex/gender, age group and migration status to identify differences and commonalities.
Results
Respondents’ attitudes towards study participation can be categorised into four themes: wanting to make a contribution, seeking personalised health information, excitement and feeling chosen, and seeking social recognition. Besides citing logistical challenges, non-participants narrated adverse experiences with or attitudes towards science and the healthcare system that deterred them from participating. A range of social experiences and cultural value systems shaped such attitudes; in particular, this includes the cultural authority of science as an arbiter of social questions, transgressing social categories and experiences of marginalisation. Care responsibilities, predominantly borne by female respondents, also impacted upon the decision to take part in NAKO.
Discussion
Our findings suggest that for participants, health research constitutes a site of distinction in the sense of making a difference and being distinct or distinguishable, whereas non-participants inhabited an orientation towards science that reflected their subjective marginalisation through science. No clear relationship can thereby be presumed between social location and a particular attitude towards study participation; rather, such attitudes transgress and challenge categorical boundaries. This challenges the understanding of particular populations as more or less disadvantaged, or as more or less inclined to participate in health research.
Funder
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg CAMPUS gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference75 articles.
1. Ahlmark N, Algren MH, Holmberg T, et al. Survey nonresponse among ethnic minorities in a national health survey–a mixed-method study of participation, barriers, and potentials. Ethn Health. 2015;20:611–32.
2. Bauer GR, Churchill SM, Mahendrana M, Walwyn C, Lizotte D, Villa-Rueda AA. Intersectionality in quantitative research: a systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM Pop Health. 2021;14: 100798.
3. Benjamin R. Informed refusal: toward a justice-based bioethics. Sci, Tech & Human Val. 2016;41(6):967–90.
4. Biddle L, Menold N, Bentner M, Nöst S, Jahn R, Ziegler S, Bozorgmehr K. Health monitoring among asylum seekers and refugees: a state-wide, cross-sectional, population-based study in Germany. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2019;16:3.
5. Bilge, S. Smuggling intersectionality into the study of masculinity: some methodological challenges. Paper presented at Feminist Research Methods: An International Conference, University of Stockholm, 4–9 February 2009: https://www.academia.edu/235051/Smuggling_Intersectionality_into_the_Study_of_Masculinity_Some_Methodological_Challenges. Accessed 2 June 2022.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献