Abstract
AbstractWhy do politicians rebel and vote against the party line when high stakes bills come to the floor of the legislature? To address that question, we leverage the three so-called Meaningful Votes that took place in the British House of Commons between January and March 2019 on the Withdrawal Agreement that the Conservative government had reached with the European Union. The bill was defeated decisively three times following a major revolt amongst Conservative backbench Members of Parliament (MPs). We find that three factors influenced their rebellion calculus: the MP’s own ideological views, constituency preferences and career concerns. Somewhat paradoxically, the rebellion within the Conservative Party came from MPs who had supported Leave in the 2016 Brexit referendum and from MPs elected in Leave-leaning constituencies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Aidt, T. S., & Franck, R. (2013). How to get the snowball rolling and extend the franchise: Voting on the Great Reform Act of 1832. Public Choice, 155(3), 229–250.
2. Aidt, T. S., & Franck, R. (2019). What motivates and oligarchic elite to democratize? Evidence from the roll call vote on the great reform act of 1832. Journal of Economic History, 79(3), 1–35.
3. Aidt, T. S., Castro, V., & Martins, R. (2018). Shades of red and blue: Government ideology and sustainable development. Public Choice, 175(3), 303–323.
4. Alabrese, E., Becker, S. O., Fetzer, T., & Novy, D. (2019). Who voted for brexit? Individual and regional data combined. European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 132–150.
5. Arnorsson, A., & Zoega, G. (2018). On the causes of Brexit. European Journal of Political Economy, 55, 301–323.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献