Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
National Social Science Fund of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2011). Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 87(3), 499–514.
2. Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158244019829575.
3. Aksnes, D. W., & Taxt, R. E. (2004). Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: A comparative study at a norwegian university. Research Evaluation, 13(1), 33–41.
4. Benda, W. G., & Engels, T. C. (2011). The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science. International Journal of Forecasting, 27(1), 166–182.
5. Bologna, F., Di Iorio, A., Peroni, S., & Poggi, F. (2022). Do open citations give insights on the qualitative peer-review evaluation in research assessments? An analysis of the Italian national scientific qualification. Scientometrics, 128, 1–35.