Funder
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Baker, M. (2016). Stat-checking software stirs up psychology. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/540151a
2. Barbour, B., & Stell, B. (2020). PubPeer: scientific assessment without metrics. Gaming the metrics misconduct and manipulation in academic research. MIT Press.
3. Bernius, S., Hanauske, M., König, W., & Dugall, B. (2009). Open Access Models and their implications for the players on the scientific publishing market. Economic Analysis and Policy, 39(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(09)50046-X
4. Brookes, P. S. (2014). Internet publicity of data problems in the bioscience literature correlates with enhanced corrective action. PeerJ, 2, e313. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.313
5. Davies, S. W., Putnam, H. M., Ainsworth, T., Baum, J. K., Bove, C. B., Crosby, S. C., Côté, I. M., Duplouy, A., Fulweiler, R. W., Griffin, A. J., Hanley, T. C., Hill, T., Humanes, A., Mangubhai, S., Metaxas, A., Parker, L. M., Rivera, H. E., Silbiger, N. J., Smith, N. S., & Bates, A. E. (2021). Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science. PLOS Biology, 19(6), e3001282. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001282