Investigating the quantity–quality relationship in scientific creativity: an empirical examination of expected residual variance and the tilted funnel hypothesis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Investigating the quantity–quality relationship in scientific creativity: an empirical examination of expected residual variance and the tilted funnel hypothesis

Published:2020-06-25 Issue:3 Volume:124 Page:2497-2518
ISSN:0138-9130
Container-title:Scientometrics
language:en
Short-container-title:Scientometrics

Author:

Forthmann Boris^ORCID,Leveling Mark^ORCID,Dong Yixiao^ORCID,Dumas Denis^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-020-03571-w.pdf

Reference52 articles.

1. Bauer, H., Schui, G., Krampen, G., & von Eye, A. (2013a). Besteht ein Zusammenhang zwischen organisationalen und individuellen Merkmalen und wissenschaftlichem Erfolg? Forschungsdaten einer szientometrischen Untersuchung zu psychologischen Forschern in deutschsprachigen Ländern [How does scientific success relate to individual and organizational characteristics? A scientometric study of psychology researchers in the German-speaking countries]. Trier, Germany: Psychologisches Datenarchiv PsychData des Leibniz-Zentrums für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation ZPID. https://doi.org/10.5160/psychdata.brhs11me22 .

2. Bauer, H. P., Schui, G., von Eye, A., & Krampen, G. (2013b). How does scientific success relate to individual and organizational characteristics? A scientometric study of psychology researchers in the German-speaking countries. Scientometrics,94, 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0760-3 .

3. Blagus, R., Leskošek, B. L., & Stare, J. (2015). Comparison of bibliometric measures for assessing relative importance of researchers. Scientometrics,105(3), 1743–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1622-6 .

4. Calver, M. C., & Bradley, J. S. (2009). Should we use the mean citations per paper to summarise a journal’s impact or to rank journals in the same field? Scientometrics,81(3), 611–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2229-y .

5. Canty, A., & Ripley, B. (2019). boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package version 1.3-22. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=boot .

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluation is Creation: Self and Social Judgments of Creativity Across the Four-C Model;Educational Psychology Review;2024-09

2. Disentangling Quantity and Quality in the Assessment of Creative Productions;Creativity Research Journal;2024-02-16

3. Using a model of domain learning to understand the development of creativity;Educational Psychologist;2024-02-14

4. Does Quality Matter? Quality Assurance in Research for the Chilean Higher Education System;Publications;2024-02-05

5. Quantity and Quality in Scientific Productivity: The Tilted Funnel Goes Bayesian;Journal of Intelligence;2022-11-01