Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, we analyze the educational paths and networks of core staff members (n = 3325) of the world’s top 100 sociology departments. Results show that a significant overrepresentation of central countries and considerable gender bias can be found throughout sociology departments with strong male dominance in high positions. By using an improved word-systemic model for the interpretation of our data, we were able to categorize the main agents and patients in the world-system of global elite sociology, and we could also describe those centripetal and centrifugal forces that absorb and reeducate peripheral talent while excluding those without Western reeducation.
Funder
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Reference71 articles.
1. Aguillo, I., Bar-IIan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. (2010). Comparing University rankings. Scientometrics,85(1), 243–256.
2. Alexa. (2020). topuniversities.com. Competitive analysis, marketing mix and traffic. Retrieved from (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/topuniversities.com. Accessed 13 June 2020.
3. Altbach, P. G. (2010). Preface. In G. Goastellec (Ed.), Understanding inequalities in, through and by higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
4. Anderson, L. (2013). Publishing strategies of young, highly mobile academics: The question of language in the European context. Language Policy,12, 273–288.
5. Baldi, S. (1994). Changes in the stratification structure of sociology: 1964–1992. American Sociologist,25, 28–43.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献