Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics
-
Published:2021-06
Issue:2
Volume:31
Page:239-256
-
ISSN:0924-6495
-
Container-title:Minds and Machines
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Minds & Machines
Author:
Morley JessicaORCID, Elhalal Anat, Garcia Francesca, Kinsey Libby, Mökander Jakob, Floridi Luciano
Abstract
AbstractAs the range of potential uses for Artificial Intelligence (AI), in particular machine learning (ML), has increased, so has awareness of the associated ethical issues. This increased awareness has led to the realisation that existing legislation and regulation provides insufficient protection to individuals, groups, society, and the environment from AI harms. In response to this realisation, there has been a proliferation of principle-based ethics codes, guidelines and frameworks. However, it has become increasingly clear that a significant gap exists between the theory of AI ethics principles and the practical design of AI systems. In previous work, we analysed whether it is possible to close this gap between the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of AI ethics through the use of tools and methods designed to help AI developers, engineers, and designers translate principles into practice. We concluded that this method of closure is currently ineffective as almost all existing translational tools and methods are either too flexible (and thus vulnerable to ethics washing) or too strict (unresponsive to context). This raised the question: if, even with technical guidance, AI ethics is challenging to embed in the process of algorithmic design, is the entire pro-ethical design endeavour rendered futile? And, if no, then how can AI ethics be made useful for AI practitioners? This is the question we seek to address here by exploring why principles and technical translational tools are still needed even if they are limited, and how these limitations can be potentially overcome by providing theoretical grounding of a concept that has been termed ‘Ethics as a Service.’
Funder
Digital Catapult Wellcome Trust
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Philosophy
Reference62 articles.
1. Aitken, M., Tully, M. P., Porteous, C., Denegri, S., Cunningham-Burley, S., Banner, N., Black, C., Burgess, M., Cross, L., Van Delden, J., Ford, E., Fox, S., Fitzpatrick, N., Gallacher, K., Goddard, C., Hassan, L., Jamieson, R., Jones, K. H., Kaarakainen, M., … Willison, D. J. (2019). Consensus statement on public involvement and engagement with data-intensive health research. International Journal of Population Data Science. https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.586 2. Aïvodji, U., Arai, H., Fortineau, O., Gambs, S., Hara, S., Tapp, A. (2019) ‘Fairwashing: The Risk of Rationalization’, 240–52. 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019 3. Alglorithm Watch. (2020, April 30). AI Ethics Guidelines Global Inventory. Algorithm Watch. https://inventory.algorithmwatch.org/ 4. Allen, C., Varner, G., & Zinser, J. (2000). Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 12(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528130050111428 5. Alshammari, M., & Simpson, A. (2017). Towards a principled approach for engineering privacy by design. In E. Schweighofer, H. Leitold, A. Mitrakas & K. Rannenberg (Eds.), Privacy technologies and policy (Vol. 10518, pp. 161–177). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67280-9_9
Cited by
96 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|