Comparative Study on the Outcome of Periorbital Wrinkles Treated with Laser-Assisted Delivery of Vitamin C or Vitamin C Plus Growth Factors: A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite promising results, laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) is not yet considered as standard therapies and published data rely mainly on laboratory tests, animal experiments or cadaver skin. Objectives This double-blind, prospective, randomized clinical trial investigates the impact in topical application of vitamin C and a cosmeceutical containing growth factors (GFs) on periorbital wrinkles primarily treated with laser skin resurfacing. Material and Methods In total, 149 female patients with periorbital wrinkles were consented and randomized into two study groups, R-C (receiving vitamin C only) and R-CGF (receiving vitamin C and a cosmeceutical containing growth factors). The statistical analysis evaluated the efficacy of each treatment regimen using software readouts provided by a three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system prior to treatment and three months after the procedure. Results were compared to confirm if there was a significant change in the skin roughness and the average depth of the wrinkles between the two groups after treatment. Results There was a significant reduction in both skin roughness and average depth of the wrinkles in the group treated with vitamin C and growth factors (p <0.01) than those treated with LADD followed by topical application of vitamin C alone. There were no cutaneous reactions or adverse systemic reactions observed in this study related to LADD with vitamin C and GFs. Conclusion Controlled laser application might have a great potential to facilitate the absorption of exogenous macromolecules by the skin. Periorbital wrinkles were reduced in both groups, but LADD using vitamin C and GFs provided significantly better results. Level of Evidence II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.