Abstract
AbstractPlanning prototyping strategies for conceptual design purposes is a crucial activity, which needs a clear understanding of the potentialities of the different typologies of prototype. Therefore, to prepare future designers, it is very important to provide the required information in design-related academic courses. However, prototypes and prototyping activities are often taught in specific courses with a major emphasis on the underpinning technologies, but with limited attention on design implications, especially about the fuzzy-front-end of the design process. The work presented in this paper aims at investigating about how students perceive the usefulness of prototypes during conceptual design activities, in order to provide first indications about the gap to be filled. To this purpose, two classes of students participated to an experimental session, and were asked to perform a conceptual design task individually. Subsequently, they participated to an on-line survey developed to gather information about the perceived usefulness of prototypes, in relation to the performed conceptual design activity. Several findings have been obtained from this work, but maybe the most impacting one concerns the different consideration that the two samples of students had about the fidelity of prototypes. Indeed, differently from what recently highlighted in current literature, it emerged that engineering students preferred low-fidelity prototypes. However, other unexpected evidences have been found, which highlight that at least for the considered institution, students still lack a comprehensive understanding of the design-related potentialities of prototypes.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Firenze
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Modelling and Simulation
Reference60 articles.
1. Camburn, B.A., Dunlap, B., Gurjar, T., et al.: A systematic method for design prototyping. J. Mech. Des. 137, 081102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030331
2. Holland, D., Conor, J.W., Bennett, G.J.: Tools for Assessing Student Learning in Mechanical Design Courses. In: DS 76: Proceedings of E&PDE 2013, the 15th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 064–069 (2013)
3. Deininger, M., Daly, S.R., Sienko, K.H., et al.: Novice designers’ use of prototypes in engineering design. Des. Stud. 51, 25–65 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.04.002
4. Schrage, M.: Cultures of prototyping. Bringing Design to Software, pp. 191–205. ACM, New York (1996)
5. Yu, F., Pasinelli, M., Brem, A.: Prototyping in theory and in practice: a study of the similarities and differences between engineers and designers. Crea. Innov. Manag. 27, 121–132 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12242
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献