In Vivo Assessment of Cortical Bone Fragility-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

In Vivo Assessment of Cortical Bone Fragility

Published:2020-02 Issue:1 Volume:18 Page:13-22
ISSN:1544-1873
Container-title:Current Osteoporosis Reports
language:en
Short-container-title:Curr Osteoporos Rep

Author:

Bowman Lyn,Loucks Anne B.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review This review updates readers on recent developments in the assessment of cortical bone fragility in vivo. The review explains the clinical need that motivated the development of Cortical Bone Mechanics Technology™ (CBMT) as a scientific instrument, its unique capabilities, and its necessary further development as a medical device. Recent Findings Clinical experience with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry has led to calls for new clinical methods for assessing bone health. CBMT is a noninvasive, dynamic 3-point bending test that makes direct, functional measurements of the mechanical properties of cortical bone in ulnas of living people. Its technical validity in accurate measurements of ulna flexural rigidity and its clinical validity in accurate estimations of quasistatic ulna bending strength have been demonstrated. Summary Because CBMT is a whole bone test, its measurements reflect the influences of bone quantity and bone quality at all hierarchical levels.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11914-020-00558-7.pdf

Reference37 articles.

1. Borders S, Petersen KR, Orne D. Prediction of bending strength of long bones from measurements of bending stiffness and bone mineral content. J Biomech Eng. 1977;99(1):40–4. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3426267.

2. Jurist JM, Foltz AS. Human ulnar bending stiffness, mineral content, geometry and strength. J Biomech. 1977;10(8):455–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(77)90099-9.

3. • Bowman L, Ellerbrock ER, Hausfeld GC, Neumeyer JM, Loucks AB. A new noninvasive mechanical bending test accurately predicts ulna bending strength in cadaveric human arms. Bone. 2019;120(3):336–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.11.018.AA detailed description of the technical and clinical validation of CBMT.

4. Bailey S, Vashishth D. Mechanical characterization of bone: state of the art in experimental approaches — what types of experiments do people do and how does one interpret the results? Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16(4):423–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-018-0454-8.

5. Black DM, Cauley JA, Wagman R, Ensrud K, Fink HA, Hillier TA, et al. The ability of a single BMD and fracture history assessment to predict fracture over 25 years in postmenopausal women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(3):389–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3194.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Quantitative Skeletal Imaging and Image-Based Modeling in Pediatric Orthopaedics;Current Osteoporosis Reports;2024-01-20

2. Fracture discrimination capability of ulnar flexural rigidity measured via Cortical Bone Mechanics Technology: study protocol for The STRONGER Study;JBMR Plus;2024-01

3. Effects of different running intensities on the micro-level failure strain of rat femoral cortical bone structures: a finite element investigation;BioMedical Engineering OnLine;2023-09-12

4. The progress in quantitative evaluation of callus during distraction osteogenesis;BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;2022-05-24