Uncertainty assessment of proarrhythmia predictions derived from multi-level in silico models
-
Published:2023-08-01
Issue:10
Volume:97
Page:2721-2740
-
ISSN:0340-5761
-
Container-title:Archives of Toxicology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Arch Toxicol
Author:
Kopańska Karolina, Rodríguez-Belenguer Pablo, Llopis-Lorente Jordi, Trenor Beatriz, Saiz Javier, Pastor ManuelORCID
Abstract
AbstractIn silico methods can be used for an early assessment of arrhythmogenic properties of drug candidates. However, their use for decision-making is conditioned by the possibility to estimate the predictions’ uncertainty. This work describes our efforts to develop uncertainty quantification methods for the predictions produced by multi-level proarrhythmia models. In silico models used in this field usually start with experimental or predicted IC50 values that describe drug-induced ion channel blockade. Using such inputs, an electrophysiological model computes how the ion channel inhibition, exerted by a drug in a certain concentration, translates to an altered shape and duration of the action potential in cardiac cells, which can be represented as arrhythmogenic risk biomarkers such as the APD90. Using this framework, we identify the main sources of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties and propose a method based on probabilistic simulations that replaces single-point estimates predicted using multiple input values, including the IC50s and the electrophysiological parameters, by distributions of values. Two selected variability types associated with these inputs are then propagated through the multi-level model to estimate their impact on the uncertainty levels in the output, expressed by means of intervals. The proposed approach yields single predictions of arrhythmogenic risk biomarkers together with value intervals, providing a more comprehensive and realistic description of drug effects on a human population. The methodology was tested by predicting arrhythmogenic biomarkers on a series of twelve well-characterised marketed drugs, belonging to different arrhythmogenic risk classes.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Generalitat Valenciana Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,General Medicine
Reference75 articles.
1. Alvarsson J, McShane SA, Norinder U, Spjuth O (2021) Predicting with confidence: using conformal prediction in drug discovery. J Pharm Sci 110(1):42–49 2. Beattie KA et al (2013) Evaluation of an in silico cardiac safety assay: using ion channel screening data to predict QT interval changes in the rabbit ventricular wedge. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 68(1):88–96 3. Benford D, Halldorsson T, Jeger MJ, Knutsen HK, More S, Naegeli H, Noteborn H, Ockleford C, Ricci A, Rychen G, Schlatter JR, Silano V, Solecki R, Turck D, Younes M, Craig P, Hart A, Von Goetz N, Koutsoumanis K, Mortensen A, Ossendorp B, Martino L et al (2018a) Guidance on uncertainty analysis in scientific assessments. EFSA J 16(1):e05123 4. Benford D, Halldorsson T, Jeger MJ, Knutsen HK, More S, Naegeli H, Noteborn H, Ockleford C, Ricci A, Rychen G, Schlatter JR, Silano V, Solecki R, Turck D, Younes M, Craig P, Hart A, Von Goetz N, Koutsoumanis K, Mortensen A, Ossendorp B, Germini A et al (2018b) The principles and methods behind EFSA’s guidance on uncertainty analysis in scientific assessment. EFSA J 16(1):e05122 5. Britton OJ et al (2013) Experimentally calibrated population of models predicts and explains intersubject variability in cardiac cellular electrophysiology. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(23):E2098-2105
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|