Author:
Manganelli Serena,Schilter Benoît,Scholz Gabriele,Benfenati Emilio,Lo Piparo Elena
Abstract
AbstractThe uncertainty regarding the safety of chemicals leaching from food packaging triggers attention. In silico models provide solutions for screening of these chemicals, since many are toxicologically uncharacterized. For hazard assessment, information on developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) is needed. The possibility to apply in silico toxicology to identify and quantify DART alerts was investigated. Open-source models and profilers were applied to 195 packaging chemicals and analogues. An approach based on DART and estrogen receptor (ER) binding profilers and molecular docking was able to identify all except for one chemical with documented DART properties. Twenty percent of the chemicals in the database known to be negative in experimental studies were classified as positive. The scheme was then applied to 121 untested chemicals. Alerts were identified for sixteen of them, five being packaging substances, the others structural analogues. Read-across was then developed to translate alerts into quantitative toxicological values. They can be used to calculate margins of exposure (MoE), the size of which reflects safety concern. The application of this approach appears valuable for hazard characterization of toxicologically untested packaging migrants. It is an alternative to the use of default uncertainty factor (UF) applied to animal chronic toxicity value to handle absence of DART data in hazard characterization.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,General Medicine
Reference53 articles.
1. Adedara IA, Farombi EO (2010) Induction of oxidative damage in the testes and spermatozoa and hematotoxicity in rats exposed to multiple doses of ethylene glycol monoethyl ether. Hum Exp Toxicol 29:801–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327109360115
2. ANSES (2018) Substance evaluation conclusion as required by REACH Article 48 and evaluation report for Methyl methacrylate EC No 201–297–1 CAS No 80–62–6. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/c92faa6c-7134-fc58-5266-5b373cdc9286. Accessed 11 Dec 2019
3. Ballantyne B, Snellings WM (2005) Developmental toxicity study with diethylene glycol dosed by gavage to CD rats and CD-1 mice. Food Chem Toxicol 43:1637–1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2005.05.005
4. Benfenati E, Chaudhry Q, Gini G, Dorne JL (2019) Integrating in silico models and read-across methods for predicting toxicity of chemicals: a step-wise strategy. Environ Int 131:105060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105060
5. Berthold MR, Cebron N, Dill F, Gabriel TR, Kötter T, Meinl T, Ohl P, Thiel K, Wiswedel B (2008) KNIME: the konstanz information miner. In: Preisach C, Burkhardt H, Schmidt-Thieme L, Decker R (eds) Data analysis, machine learning and applications. Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Springer, Berlin, pp 319–326
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献