Bimodal age distribution at diagnosis in breast cancer persists across molecular and genomic classifications
-
Published:2019-09-18
Issue:1
Volume:179
Page:185-195
-
ISSN:0167-6806
-
Container-title:Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Breast Cancer Res Treat
Author:
Allott Emma H.ORCID, Shan Yue, Chen Mengjie, Sun Xuezheng, Garcia-Recio Susana, Kirk Erin L., Olshan Andrew F., Geradts Joseph, Earp H. Shelton, Carey Lisa A., Perou Charles M., Pfeiffer Ruth M., Anderson William F., Troester Melissa A.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Female breast cancer demonstrates bimodal age frequency distribution patterns at diagnosis, interpretable as two main etiologic subtypes or groupings of tumors with shared risk factors. While RNA-based methods including PAM50 have identified well-established clinical subtypes, age distribution patterns at diagnosis as a proxy for etiologic subtype are not established for molecular and genomic tumor classifications.
Methods
We evaluated smoothed age frequency distributions at diagnosis for Carolina Breast Cancer Study cases within immunohistochemistry-based and RNA-based expression categories. Akaike information criterion (AIC) values compared the fit of single density versus two-component mixture models. Two-component mixture models estimated the proportion of early-onset and late-onset categories by immunohistochemistry-based ER (n = 2860), and by RNA-based ESR1 and PAM50 subtype (n = 1965). PAM50 findings were validated using pooled publicly available data (n = 8103).
Results
Breast cancers were best characterized by bimodal age distribution at diagnosis with incidence peaks near 45 and 65 years, regardless of molecular characteristics. However, proportional composition of early-onset and late-onset age distributions varied by molecular and genomic characteristics. Higher ER-protein and ESR1-RNA categories showed a greater proportion of late age-at-onset. Similarly, PAM50 subtypes showed a shifting age-at-onset distribution, with most pronounced early-onset and late-onset peaks found in Basal-like and Luminal A, respectively.
Conclusions
Bimodal age distribution at diagnosis was detected in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, similar to national cancer registry data. Our data support two fundamental age-defined etiologic breast cancer subtypes that persist across molecular and genomic characteristics. Better criteria to distinguish etiologic subtypes could improve understanding of breast cancer etiology and contribute to prevention efforts.
Funder
National Cancer Institute Susan G. Komen American Institute for Cancer Research Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference40 articles.
1. Butler EN, Tse CK, Bell ME, Conway K, Olshan AF, Troester MA (2016) Active smoking and risk of luminal and basal-like breast cancer subtypes in the Carolina breast cancer study. Cancer Causes Control 27(6):775–786.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-016-0754-1 2. Allott EH, Cohen SM, Geradts J, Sun X, Khoury T, Bshara W, Zirpoli GR, Miller CR, Hwang H, Thorne LB, O’Connor S, Tse CK, Bell MB, Hu Z, Li Y, Kirk EL, Bethea TN, Perou CM, Palmer JR, Ambrosone CB, Olshan AF, Troester MA (2016) Performance of three-biomarker immunohistochemistry for intrinsic breast cancer subtyping in the AMBER consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 25(3):470–478.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0874 3. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T, Quist H, Matese JC, Brown PO, Botstein D, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191367098 4. Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS, Prat A, Perou CM, Sherman ME (2014) How many etiological subtypes of breast cancer: two, three, four, or more? J Natl Cancer Inst.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju165 5. Anderson WF, Pfeiffer RM, Dores GM, Sherman ME (2006) Comparison of age distribution patterns for different histopathologic types of breast carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(10):1899–1905.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0191
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|