The ‘Galilean Style in Science’ and the Inconsistency of Linguistic Theorising-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The ‘Galilean Style in Science’ and the Inconsistency of Linguistic Theorising

Published:2011-07-13 Issue:1 Volume:17 Page:91-108
ISSN:1233-1821
Container-title:Foundations of Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Found Sci

Author:

Kertész András

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Multidisciplinary

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10699-011-9234-y.pdf

Reference52 articles.

1. Baltin M. R. (1987) Degree complements. In: Huck G. J., Ojeda A. E. (eds) Discontinuous constituency. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 11–26

2. Boeckx C. (2006) Linguistic minimalism: Origins, concepts, methods and aims. Oxford University Press, Oxford

3. Boeckx C. (2010) Linguistic minimalism. In: Heine B., Narrog H. (eds) The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 485–505

4. Borsley, R. D. (Ed.), (2005). Data in theoretical linguistics [=Lingua 115, 1475–1665].

5. Botha R. P. (1983) On the ‘Galilean style’ of linguistic inquiry. Lingua 58: 1–50

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Generative linguistics: ‘Galilean style’;Language Sciences;2023-11

2. Relativism Versus Absolutism in Linguistics;Foundations of Science;2023-05-04

3. Otto Jespersen, one more broken leg in the historical stool of generative linguistics;Historiographia Linguistica;2021-12-31

4. Fallacies in the Historiography of Generative Linguistics;Foundations of Science;2019-06-10

5. 17. The uncertainty of syntactic theorizing;Current Approaches to Syntax;2019-05-06