Abstract
AbstractWhether truth is absolute or relative has been a widely discussed topic for over two thousand years in epistemology and the philosophy of science. However, this issue has not yet been discussed systematically with respect to linguistics. The present paper attempts to make the first step toward filling this gap. It raises the following question in Sect. 1: What kind of relationship is there between the pluralism of inquiry, the relativistic and the absolutistic approach to truth, and the tolerance of views differing from one’s own in the practice of linguistic research? After Sect. 2 has clarified what is meant by ‘relativism’, ‘absolutism’, ‘pluralism’ and ‘tolerance’, Sects. 3–5 describe, analyse, and systematize the ways in which relativistic and absolutistic views are manifested in linguistic theorizing. Finally, Sect. 6 summarizes the findings and gives a sophisticated answer to the main question of the paper.
Funder
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
University of Debrecen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Multidisciplinary
Reference112 articles.
1. Andor, J. (2004). The master and his performance: An interview with Noam Chomsky. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1, 93–111.
2. Bach, E. (1965). Structural linguistics and the philosophy of science. Diogenes, 51, 111–128.
3. Baghramian, M., & Carter, A. J. (2015). Relativism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved Feb 20, 2020, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism/.
4. Baghramian, M. (Ed.). (2014). The many faces of relativism. Routledge.
5. Baghramian, M., & Colina, A. (2020). Relativism. Routledge.