A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography

Published:2011-03-12 Issue:1 Volume:17 Page:51-89
ISSN:1233-1821
Container-title:Foundations of Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Found Sci

Author:

Katz Karin Usadi,Katz Mikhail G.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Multidisciplinary

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10699-011-9223-1.pdf

Reference150 articles.

1. Alexander A. (2001) Exploration mathematics: the rhetoric of discovery and the rise of infinitesimal methods. Configurations 9(1): 1–36

2. Arkeryd L. (1981) Intermolecular forces of infinite range and the Boltzmann equation. Archievs of Rational Mechanical Analysis 77(1): 11–21

3. Arkeryd L. (2005) Nonstandard analysis. American Mathematics Monthly 112(10): 926–928

4. Avigad J. (2007) Response to questionnaire. In: Hendricks Vincent F., Leitgeb H. (eds) Philosophy of mathematics: 5 Questions. Automatic/VIP Press, New York

5. Barner, K. Fermats “adaequare”—und kein Ende? Mathematische Semesterberichte. http://www.springerlink.com/content/5r32u25207611m37/ .

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ontological and methodological virtues of unification;Journal of Physics: Conference Series;2020-02-01

2. Fermat’s Dilemma: Why Did He Keep Mum on Infinitesimals? And the European Theological Context;Foundations of Science;2017-11-14

3. Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures;Foundations of Science;2016-09-21

4. A Non-Standard Analysis of a Cultural Icon: The Case of Paul Halmos;Logica Universalis;2016-07-06

5. Is Leibnizian Calculus Embeddable in First Order Logic?;Foundations of Science;2016-06-22