The ‘Empirical’ in the Empirical Turn: A Critical Analysis

Author:

Bosschaert Mariska ThalithaORCID,Blok Vincent

Abstract

Abstract During the second half of the twentieth century, several philosophers of technology argued that their predecessors had reflected too abstractly and pessimistically on technology. In the view of these critics, one should study technologies empirically in order to fully understand them. They developed several strategies to empirically inform the philosophy of technology and called their new approach the empirical turn. However, they provide insufficient indications of what exactly is meant by empirical study in their work. This leads to the critical question of what counts as an empirically informed philosophy of technology in the empirical turn. In order to answer this question, we first elaborate on the problems that the empirical turn philosophers tried to address; secondly, we sketch their solutions, and, thirdly, we critically discuss their conceptions of empirical study. Our critical analysis of the empirical turn contributes to new efforts to engage in an empirically informed philosophy of technology.

Funder

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk 2Onderzoek

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Multidisciplinary

Reference87 articles.

1. Achterhuis, H. (2001a). Introduction: American philosophy of technology (R.P. Crease, Trans.). In H. Achterhuis (Ed.), American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn (pp. 1–9). Indiana University. (Original work published 1997)

2. Achterhuis, H. (2001b). Andrew Feenberg: Farewell to dystopia (R.P. Crease, Trans.). In H. Achterhuis (Ed.), American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn (pp. 65–93). Indiana University. (Original work published 1997)

3. Aydin, C. (2013). The artifactual mind: Overcoming the ‘inside–outside. Dualism in the extended mind thesis and recognizing the technological dimension of cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14, 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9319-x

4. Aydin, C., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2015). Transcendence in technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 19(3), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2015121742

5. Baird, D. (2000). The thing-y-ness of things: Materiality and spectrochemical instrumentation, 1937–1955. In C. Mitcham, P. A. Kroes, & A. W. M. Meijers (Eds.), The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology (pp. 99–117). JAI.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3