Abstract
AbstractTechnologies are undeniably having a decisive, transformative impact on Earth, yet the currently prevailing empirically orientated approaches in the philosophy of technology seem unable to get to conceptual grips with this fact. Some thinkers have therefore been trying to develop alternative methods capable of clarifying it. This paper focuses on Vincent Blok’s call for rehabilitating an ontologically oriented approach. It reconstructs the rationale of his method as well as its key elements and structure. Elucidating Blok’s emphasis on the experience of climate change, the paper clarifies his call for a terrestrial turn in the philosophy of technology. This turn is indisputably needed, but Blok’s conceptualisation of Earth is problematic: Apart from its speculative nature, it underestimates the impact of humans on Earth. Blok seeks to clarify how ontic phenomena, especially particular technologies, can have an ontological impact, but there is a friction between his Heideggerian concept of the world as grounding inner-worldly beings and the idea of technologies as founding a new world. Identifying the elements where the undoubtedly required ontological approach needs to be rethought, the paper suggests that we need more mundane conceptualisations of both Earth and the world, accompanied by more attention to ontic processes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Multidisciplinary
Reference33 articles.
1. Achterhuis, H. (Ed.). (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2. Benyus, J. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by Nature. New York: Harper Perennial.
3. Blok, V. (2014a). Being-in-the-world as being-in-Nature: An ecological perspective on being and Time. Studia Phænomenologica, XIV, 215–235.
4. Blok, V. (2014b). Reconnecting with Nature in the age of technology: The Heidegger and Radical Environmentalism Debate Revisited. Environmental Philosophy, 11(2), 307–332.
5. Blok, V. (2016). Thinking the Earth: Critical reflections on Quentin Meillassoux’s and Heidegger’s Concept of the Earth. Environmental Ethics, 38(4), 441–462.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Neganthropocene Revisited: Entropy, World, Earth;Pedagogical Encounters in the Post-Anthropocene, Volume 2;2024