Promoting Physical Activity in a Low-Income Multiethnic District: Effects of a Community Intervention Study to Reduce Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease
Author:
Jenum Anne Karen12, Anderssen Sigmund A.3, Birkeland Kåre I.1, Holme Ingar3, Graff-Iversen Sidsel2, Lorentzen Catherine4, Ommundsen Yngvar4, Raastad Truls5, Ødegaard Ann Kristin6, Bahr Roald3
Affiliation:
1. Diabetes Research Centre, Aker University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 2. Department of Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway 3. Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway 4. Department of Coaching and Psychology, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway 5. Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway 6. City of Oslo, Grorud District, Oslo, Norway
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—The aim was to assess the net effects on risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease of a community-based 3-year intervention to increase physical activity.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A pseudo-experimental cohort design was used to compare changes in risk factors from an intervention and a control district with similar socioeconomic status in Oslo, Norway, using a baseline investigation of 2,950 30- to 67-year-old participants and a follow-up investigation of 1,776 (67% of those eligible, 56% women, 18% non-Western immigrants) participants. A set of theory-based activities to promote physical activity were implemented and tailored toward groups with different psychosocial readiness for change. All results reported are net changes (the difference between changes in the intervention and control districts). At both surveys, the nonfasting serum levels of lipids and glucose were adjusted for time since last meal.
RESULTS—The increase in physical activity measured by two self-reported questionnaires was 9.5% (P = 0.008) and 8.1% (P = 0.02), respectively. The proportion who increased their body mass was 14.2% lower in the intervention district (P < 0.001), implying a 50% relative reduction compared with the control district, and was lower across subgroups. Beneficial effects were seen for triglyceride levels (0.16 mmol/l [95% CI 0.06–0.25], P = 0.002), cholesterol–to–HDL cholesterol ratio (0.12 [0.03–0.20], P = 0.007), systolic blood pressure (3.6 mmHg [2.2–4.8], P < 0.001), and for men also in glucose levels (0.35 mmol/l [0.03–0.67], P = 0.03). The net proportion who were quitting smoking was 2.9% (0.1–5.7, P = 0.043).
CONCLUSIONS—Through a theory-driven, low-cost, population-based intervention program, we observed an increase in physical activity levels, reduced weight gain, and beneficial changes in other risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference42 articles.
1. Manson JE, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Krolewski AS, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE: Physical activity and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. Lancet 338: 774–778, 1991 2. Manson JE, Nathan DM, Krolewski AS, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hennekens CH: A prospective study of exercise and incidence of diabetes among US male physicians. JAMA 268:63–67, 1992 3. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, Salminen V, Uusitupa M: Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 344:1343–1350, 2001 4. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM: Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346:393–403, 2002 5. Rose G: The Strategy of Preventive Medicine. Oxford, U.K., Oxford University Press, 1999
Cited by
58 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|