Affiliation:
1. Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Ap Lei Chau Clinic, Ap Lei Chau, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
2. School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
3. Primary and Community Services Department, Hospital Authority Head Office, Hong Kong Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the 5-year effectiveness of a multidisciplinary Risk Assessment and Management Programme–Diabetes Mellitus (RAMP-DM) in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
A 5-year prospective cohort study was conducted with 121,584 Chinese primary care patients with type 2 DM who were recruited between August 2009 and June 2011. Missing data were dealt with multiple imputations. After excluding patients with prior diabetes mellitus (DM)-related complications and one-to-one propensity score matching on all patient characteristics, 26,718 RAMP-DM participants and 26,718 matched usual care patients were followed up for a median time of 4.5 years. The effect of RAMP-DM on nine DM-related complications and all-cause mortality were evaluated using Cox regressions. The first incidence for each event was used for all models. Health service use was analyzed using negative binomial regressions. Subgroup analyses on different patient characteristics were performed.
RESULTS
The cumulative incidence of all events (DM-related complications and all-cause mortality) was 23.2% in the RAMP-DM group and 43.6% in the usual care group. RAMP-DM led to significantly greater reductions in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk by 56.6% (95% CI 54.5, 58.6), microvascular complications by 11.9% (95% CI 7.0, 16.6), mortality by 66.1% (95% CI 64.3, 67.9), specialist attendance by 35.0% (95% CI 33.6, 36.4), emergency attendance by 41.2% (95% CI 39.8, 42.5), and hospitalizations by 58.5% (95% CI 57.2, 59.7). Patients with low baseline CVD risks benefitted the most from RAMP-DM, which decreased CVD and mortality risk by 60.4% (95% CI 51.8, 67.5) and 83.6% (95% CI 79.3, 87.0), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
This naturalistic study highlighted the importance of early optimal DM control and risk factor management by risk stratification and multidisciplinary, protocol-driven, chronic disease model care to delay disease progression and prevent complications.
Funder
HA
Health and Medical Research Fund
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference57 articles.
1. Children and adolescents;American Diabetes Association;Diabetes Care,2015
2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Type 2 diabetes in adults: management [Internet], 2015. Available from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28. Accessed 15 February 2017
3. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2;Bodenheimer;JAMA,2002
4. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness;Bodenheimer;JAMA,2002