Optimizing physician‐encounter frequency for type 2 diabetes patients in primary care based on cardiovascular risk assessment: A target trial emulation study

Author:

Xu Wanchun1,Wang Yuan1,Tanuseputro Peter23,Lam Cindy Lo Kuen14,Wan Eric Yuk Fai156ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China

2. Department of Medicine Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

3. Bruyere Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada

4. Department of Family Medicine The University of Hong Kong ‐ Shenzhen Hospital Shenzhen China

5. Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China

6. Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health (D24H) Hong Kong China

Abstract

AbstractAimTo investigate whether the physician‐encounter interval for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) can be optimized from 2–3 to 4–6 months among those with a calculated 10‐year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score of less than 20% without compromising their long‐term outcomes.Materials and MethodsUsing territory‐wide public electronic medical records in Hong Kong, we emulated a target trial to compare the effectiveness of the physician‐encounter intervals of 4‐6 versus 2‐3 months for T2D patients without prior CVDs and with a predicted risk for CVDs of less than 20% (i.e. those patients not in the high‐risk category). Propensity score matching was used to emulate the randomization of participants at baseline, where 42 154 matched individuals were included for analysis. The marginal structural model was applied to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for CVD incidence and all‐cause mortality, the incidence rate ratio of secondary and tertiary care utilization, as well as the between‐group differences in HbA1c, blood pressure and cholesterol levels.ResultsDuring a follow‐up period of up to 12 (average: 5.1) years, there was no significantly increased risk of CVD in patients with physician‐encounter intervals of 4‐6 months compared with those patients with physician‐encounter intervals of 2‐3 months (HR [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 1.01 [0.90, 1.14]; standardized 10‐year risk difference [95% CI]: −0.1% [−0.7%, 0.6%]), nor for all‐cause mortality (HR: 1.00 [0.84, 1.20]; standardized 10‐year risk difference: −0.1% [−0.5%, 0.3%]). Additionally, there was no observable difference in the utilization of secondary and tertiary care or key clinical parameters between these two follow‐up frequencies.ConclusionsFor T2D patients with a calculated 10‐year CVD risk of less than 20%, the interval of regular physician encounters can be optimized from 2–3 to 4–6 months without compromising patients' long‐term outcomes and saving substantial service resources in primary care.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3