Affiliation:
1. Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, San Diego, CA
2. Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
3. University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
4. Neighborhood Healthcare, San Diego, CA
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Type 2 diabetes is growing in epidemic proportions and disproportionately affects lower-income, diverse communities. Text messaging may provide one of the most rapid methods to overcome the “digital divide” to improve care.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
A randomized, nonblinded, parallel-groups clinical trial design allocated N = 126 low-income, Hispanic participants with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes to receive the Dulce Digital intervention or usual care (UC). Dulce Digital participants received up to three motivational, educational, and/or call-to-action text messages per day over 6 months. The primary outcome was HbA1c; lipids, blood pressure, and BMI were secondary outcomes. Satisfaction and acceptability were evaluated via focus groups and self-report survey items.
RESULTS
The majority of patients were middle-aged (mean age 48.43 years, SD 9.80), female (75%), born in Mexico (91%), and uninsured (75%) and reported less than a ninth-grade education level (73%) and mean baseline HbA1c 9.5% (80 mmol/mol), SD 1.3, and fasting plasma glucose 187.17 mg/dL, SD 64.75. A statistically significant time-by-group interaction effect indicated that the Dulce Digital group achieved a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c over time compared with UC (P = 0.03). No statistically significant effects were observed for secondary clinical indicators. The number of blood glucose values texted in by participants was a statistically significant predictor of month 6 HbA1c (P < 0.05). Satisfaction and acceptability ratings for the Dulce Digital intervention were high.
CONCLUSIONS
Use of a simple, low-cost text messaging program was found to be highly acceptable in this sample of high-risk, Hispanic individuals with type 2 diabetes and resulted in greater improvement in glycemic control compared with UC.
Funder
McKesson Foundation
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Subject
Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference35 articles.
1. International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF Diabetes Atlas [Internet], 2015. 7th ed. Brussels, Belgium, International Diabetes Federation. Available from http://www.diabetesatlas.org. Accessed 2 January 2017
2. Disparities in the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes - United States, 1999-2002 and 2011-2014;Beckles;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2016
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States [article online], 2014. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/2014statisticsreport.html. Accessed 2 January 2017
4. Surge in newly identified diabetes among medicaid patients in 2014 within medicaid expansion States under the affordable care act;Kaufman;Diabetes Care,2015
5. Glucose control in diabetes: the impact of racial differences on monitoring and outcomes;Campbell;Endocrine,2012
Cited by
123 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献