Intensive Therapy With Inhaled Insulin via the AERx Insulin Diabetes Management System

Author:

Hermansen Kjeld1,Rönnemaa Tapani2,Petersen Astrid Heide3,Bellaire Shannon3,Adamson Ulf4

Affiliation:

1. Aarhus Amtssygehus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

2. Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland

3. Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark

4. Karolinska Institutet at Danderyds Sjukhus, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To compare the glycemic control of inhaled insulin via the AERx insulin diabetes management system (iDMS) with that of subcutaneous (SC) insulin, both combined with NPH insulin at bedtime, in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The AERx iDMS uses a liquid insulin formulation to achieve flexible precise mealtime dosing (with increments corresponding to 1 IU administered subcutaneously) and ensures insulin delivery only when the breathing technique is optimal. This trial in patients with type 2 diabetes compared the glycemic control (HbA1c) achieved by inhaled insulin administered via AERx iDMS with that using SC insulin. This was a randomized, 12-week, open-label, parallel, multicenter, multinational trial in 107 nonsmoking patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age 59 years, mean duration of diabetes 11.9 years). Patients were randomized to receive either inhaled fast-acting human insulin via AERx iDMS immediately before meals or SC fast-acting human insulin administered 30 min before meals, both in combination with evening NPH insulin. RESULTS—Baseline and demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c between the AERx and SC groups after 12 weeks of treatment (7.84 ± 0.77 vs. 7.76 ± 0.77%, P = 0.60). Fasting serum glucose was significantly lower in the AERx group compared with the SC group by the end of the trial (8.9 ± 3.8 vs. 10.8 ± 3.7 mmol/l, P = 0.01) with a similar NPH dose in the two groups (0.23 vs. 0.23 IU/kg, P = 0.93). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the intra-subject variability of fasting or prandial blood glucose increment. Adverse events were similar in the two groups. No major safety concerns were raised during the trial. CONCLUSIONS—In patients with type 2 diabetes, preprandial inhaled insulin via AERx iDMS is as effective as preprandial SC insulin injection in achieving glycemic control with similar tolerability.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 105 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. New Routes of Insulin for Diabetes Treatment;International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology;2023-03-22

2. Solid lipid nanoparticles: a promising tool for insulin delivery;Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery;2022-11-02

3. Inhalation of Insulin for Diabetes Management;Nanotechnology for Diabetes Management;2022-09-19

4. Therapeutic peptides for the treatment of cystic fibrosis: Challenges and perspectives;European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry;2021-03

5. Inhaled Medications Employed in Critically Ill Patients;Essentials of Aerosol Therapy in Critically ill Patients;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3