Factors influencing the implementation of knowledge management in the South African government

Author:

Barbier LanceORCID,Tengeh RobertsonORCID

Abstract

Although Knowledge Management was introduced as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI) for all senior management in South Africa 15 years ago, its implementation has been slow and inconsistent. This paper aimed to identify the factors that contribute to or deter the implementation of Knowledge Management in the South African government. The issue was explored through a review of literature on Knowledge Management, as well as results of an interview and questionnaire completed by government officials doing Knowledge Management practitioner work in the South African government. The quantitative data was analysed using DATAtab. The findings identified two key factors that deter the implementation of Knowledge Management in the South African government: most departments in the South African government do not value Knowledge Management, and public officials responsible for implementing Knowledge Management in their departments lack implementation skills. A lack of research on Knowledge Management in developmental governments exists. More research on this subject is necessary. The research will benefit Knowledge Management and Public Administration practitioners alike.

Publisher

Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference80 articles.

1. Adam, A. M. (2020). Sample size determination in survey research. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports, 25(5), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2020/v26i530263

2. Adler, R. M. (2019). Knowledge management strategies for critical decision-making. https://medium.com/@rich_77042/knowledge-management-strategies-for-critical-decision-making-a94f921f094a Retrieved July 27 2020

3. Akhavan, P., & Jafari, M. (2006). Critical issues for knowledge management implementation at a national level. VINE, 36(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720610667372

4. Allassignmenthelp, U. K. (2019). Saunders research onion for effective research methodology. Cockburn Central: Allassignmenthelp.

5. Bolderston, A. (2012). Conducting a research interview. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 43(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2011.12.002

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3