Cost-Effectiveness Assessment of Five Audio Recording Systems for Wildlife Monitoring: Differences between Recording Distances and Singing Direction-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cost-Effectiveness Assessment of Five Audio Recording Systems for Wildlife Monitoring: Differences between Recording Distances and Singing Direction

Published:2019-05-24 Issue:2 Volume:66 Page:311
ISSN:0570-7358
Container-title:Ardeola
language:
Short-container-title:Ardeola

Author:

Pérez-Granados Cristian¹,Bota Gerard²,Giralt David²,Albarracín Josep²,Traba Juan¹

Affiliation:

1. Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM), Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

2. Biodiversity and Animal Conservation Lab. Landscape Dynamics and Biodiversity programme. Forest Science and Technology Center of Catalonia (CTFC), Solsona, Catalonia, Spain.

Publisher

Ardeola

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Animal Science and Zoology

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Quantifying and mitigating recorder-induced variability in ecological acoustic indices;Ecological Informatics;2024-09

2. Field tests of small autonomous recording units: an evaluation of in-person versus automated point counts and a comparison of recording quality;Bioacoustics;2024-03-03

3. The importance of acoustic background modelling in CNN-based detection of the neotropical White-lored Spinetail (Aves, Passeriformes, Furnaridae);Bioacoustics;2024-02-13

4. Quantifying and mitigating recorder-induced variability in ecological acoustic indices;2023-10-19

5. Evaluating factors affecting species detection using passive acoustic monitoring in neotropical forests: a playback experiment;Bioacoustics;2023-08-25