Preliminary Results of The Treatment for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Full Endoscopic Approach at Saint Paul General Hospital, in Hanoi, Vietnam

Abstract

Objective: Patients with radiculopathy after failed spine surgery due to restenosis, regenerated bony spurs, or inadequate decompression face high risks for morbidity or disability following massive revision operations. Therefore, fully endoscopic spine surgery could be less invasive, safer, and more effective because of accurate exposure, precise decompression, and avoidance of neural tissue injury. Our report aimed to describe the clinical result of selected patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) treated with fully endoscopic spine surgery at Saint Paul General Hospital in Vietnam.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients with FBSS who were treated with uniportal fully endoscopic surgery at Saint Paul General Hospital with an average follow-up period of 16 months.Results: The patients’ average age was 61 years (range, 24–83 years), and the difference between preoperative and postoperative leg pain at the last follow-up was statistically significant (preoperative leg pain visual analogue scale [VAS]=7.1; last follow-up leg pain VAS=0.8; p<0.01). The difference in Oswestry Disability Index scores between the preoperative assessment and the final examination was statistically significant (preoperative, 57.8; last follow-up, 21.2; p<0.01). According to improvements in the MacNab score, the percentage of patients who achieved good or excellent postoperative results was 75%.Conclusion: Major open surgery as a revisional procedure in patients with FBSS syndrome has many potential risks during and after surgery. Fully endoscopic spine surgery can be a safe and effective option for selected cases with lower risk.