Abstract
This study sought to reappraise the study Referral counselling method and financial counselling method among mothers in Cross River State, Nigeria. The study was purely a sampling and purposive sampling technique. The questionnaire called (SMCQ) was the instrument used for data collection. The instrument was subjected to face validity by one expert in Guidance and Counselling and two experts in measurement and evaluation in the Faculty of Education, University of Calabar. The reliability estimate of the instrument was established through the Cronbach Alfa reliability method. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was the statistical analysis technique adopted to test the hypotheses under study. All hypotheses were subjected to testing at a .05 level of significance. The study showed that women whose referral counselling method were low were significantly different in their safe motherhood practices among women of reproductive age from those whose referral counselling method was either moderate or high. Also, women whose referral counselling method was moderate were significantly different from those who were high in safe motherhood practices among women of reproductive age. From the data analysis, the researcher found that: referral counselling methods and financial counselling methods significantly influence safe motherhood practices among women of reproductive age. The financial counselling method had a significant influence on safe motherhood practices among women of reproductive age, a post hoc analysis was employed using Fishers’ Least Significant Difference (LSD) multiple comparison analysis. Based on the findings of the study the researcher recommended among others that disrespectful treatment of mother would discourage them from taking counselling classes and practising safe motherhood and the researcher suggest that perhaps maternal referral counselling usage is low because of the delays mothers encounter in the facilities in the facilities they are referred.
Publisher
African - British Journals
Reference18 articles.
1. Alabi, J. P. (2019). “Domains of core competency, standards, and quality assurance for building global capacity in health promotion: The Galway consensus conference statement.” Health Education & Behavior 36(3), 476-482.
2. Ameyaw, E.K., Njue, C. &Tran, N.T. et al. (2021). The attitude of health workers towards pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 521 (2021). thttps://doi.org/11.1286/s12884-020-03229-34
3. Ameyaw, E.K., Njue, C. &Tran, N.T. et al. (2020). Quality and women’s satisfaction with maternal referral practices in sub-Saharan African low and lower-middle income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 682 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03339-3 home countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 682 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03339-3
4. Angèle, M. N., Abel, N. M. & Jacques, O. M. et al. (2021). Social and economic consequences of the cost of obstetric and neonatal care in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo: a mixed methods study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth21, 315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03765-x
5. Arthur G. (2015). Decentralised Delivery of Primary Health Services in Nigeria: Survey Evidence from the States of Lagos and Kogi, Washington: The World Bank