Facilitating the ideas-informed society: a systematic review

Author:

Brown ChrisORCID,Luzmore Ruth,Groß Ophoff JanaORCID

Abstract

Background: The concept of the ideas-informed society represents a desired situation in which: 1) citizens see value in staying up to date, and 2) citizens regularly keep themselves up to date by actively engaging with new ideas, developments and claims to truth, doing so both openly and critically. As a result, individuals become ever more knowledgeable, are better able to make good decisions, as well as find themselves in better position to re-align their values in response to new progressive norms and beliefs. Given these potential benefits, of primary interest are those who do not value staying up to date, nor attempt to do so. Methods: With this systematic review we have sought to identify ways to consider how such ‘ideas refusers’ might be switched-on to engaging with new ideas. We have done so by exploring: 1) the factors which act as barriers to and enablers of the actualisation of the ideas-informed society; 2) interventions/programmes and community-led activities developed to actualise the ideas-informed society; and 3) other non-empirically tested/verified suggestions for how the ideas-informed society might be actualised. Our findings derive from 25 research outputs (from a total of 631 originally identified) as well as examine case studies of ‘bottom-up’ analogous activities. Results: Our review highlights the presence of seemingly impactful approaches to enabling citizens to engage with new ideas, including science cafés and museum exhibitions. Other more bottom-up approaches include community-based events and festivals; social networks (and discussion within these networks) are also key to whether and how individuals engage with ideas, and the breadth of ideas they engage with. Conclusions: We conclude by suggesting development and rigorous testing is now needed of interventions that seek to: 1) pique citizens’ curiosity; 2) establish connections to social networks and; 3) arm citizens with essential ideas-related dispositions.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference59 articles.

1. Chapter 2: Does Public Media Enhance Citizen Knowledge?;T Aalberg;The Death of Public Knowledge?,2019

2. A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014.;P Achterberg;Public Underst Sci.,2017

3. The role of media and deference to scientific authority in cultivating trust in sources of information about emerging technologies.;A Anderson;Int J Public Opin Res.,2012

4. Planning for critically informed active citizenship. Lessons from Social Studies Classrooms;R Atkins,2016

5. What intellectual empathy can offer information literacy education.;A Baer;Informed Societies: Why information literacy matters for citizenship, participation and democracy.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3