Health policy and controlling Covid-19 in England: sociological insights

Author:

Calnan MichaelORCID

Abstract

The global Covid-19 pandemic is posing considerable challenges for governments throughout the world and has and will have a significant influence on the shape of peoples social and economic life and wellbeing in the short and longer term. This opinion paper discusses the current health policy response adopted in England to control or manage the epidemic and identifies the key sociological and political influences which have shaped these policies. Drawing on the theoretical approach set out in his recent book, which emphasises the interplay of powerful structural and economic interest groups, the author will consider the influence of the key players. Government policy has tied itself to scientific and medical evidence and protecting the NHS so the key roles of the medical profession, public health scientific community and NHS management and their respective and relative powerful influences will be discussed. The government needs the support of the public if their policies are to be successful, so how have the government addressed maintaining public trust in this ‘crisis’ and how much trust do the public have in the government and what has influenced it? The strong emphasis on social distancing and social isolation in the national government policy response to Covid-19 has placed an increasing public reliance on the traditional and social media for sources of information so how the media has framed the policy will be considered. One policy aim is for an effective vaccine and the influence of the drug industry in its development is discussed. Finally, the role of the state will be discussed and what has shaped its social and economic policies.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference75 articles.

1. The scandals of Covid-19.;K Abbasi;BMJ.,2020a

2. Covid-19: Questions of conscience and duty of scientific advisers.;K Abbasi;BMJ.,2020b

3. Class Inequalities in Health and the Coronavirus: a cruel irony;S Arber,2020

4. Repairing trust in organizations and institutions: Toward a conceptual framework.;R Bachman;Organ Stud.,2015

5. Germanys virus responses shine unforgiving light on Britain.;A Barker,2020

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How person-centred care can be provided in forensic mental health;British Journal of Nursing;2023-08-17

2. Need for effective detection and early warnings for epidemic and pandemic preparedness planning in the context of multi-hazards: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic;International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction;2023-06

3. Power, Policy and the Pandemic;EMERALD POINTS;2022-02-14

4. References;Power, Policy and the Pandemic;2022-02-14

5. Experienced Change, Unsettlement and Crisis;Psycho-Social Approaches to the Covid-19 Pandemic;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3