Conceptual and Categorical Apparatus of the Concepts of “Right” and “Law” and Their Relationship

Author:

MELNYK NADIIA

Abstract

In today’s context, the definitions of “right” and “law” are becoming increasingly important, because right is a normatively enshrined justice, and the law is the compiler of social relations. The aim of the article is to clarify the content and essence of the definitions of “right” and “law”, to determine their relationship and difference and to reflect on this basis their own vision in jurisprudence. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is the historical and legal method, structural and functional method, comparative method. The content and essence of the definitions of “right” and “law” are considered. The essence and understanding of such legal phenomena as natural law that arose outside society and positive law created by the state are clarified. The current views of Ukrainian researchers on the characteristics of common and distinctive features of positive and natural law, which differ in certain norms of behavior created by people to determine what is allowed and what is not legally allowed and are expressed in the form of laws. Considering the common features, it is determined that natural law fills the gaps in positive law, because human behaviour is determined not by man himself, but by the law that dominates him with a combination of justice and legality. The main ways of development and existence of positive law are identified, among which are customary law, law of judges, law of the legislator. The main features of positive law, which include mandatory regulations; the expression of norms in laws and other sources determined by the state; formal certainty; state security. The norms and principles of natural law, which are absolute in nature, confirm the truth that man can not live in a world where everything is relative and rely only on contractual bases, which are formulated by the people themselves. It is proposed to conduct research on the relationship and distinction between the concepts of “right” and “law” used in the process of scientific knowledge of a particular problem with which the researcher substantiates his research phenomenon

Publisher

Scientific Journals Publishing House

Subject

General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. [1] Selivanov, V.M. (2005). Right and law (philosophical view of the relationship between right and law). Problems of Philosophy of Law, 3(1-2), 51-62.

2. [2] Savenko, V.V. (2016). Comparative analysis of the concepts of “right” and “law” as elements of legal reality. Young Scientist, 8(35), 107-110.

3. [3] Lutskyi, R.P. (2011). Positive law and natural law: Opposition of categories. Scientific Journal “Chronicles of KUL”, 4, 38-41.

4. [4] Kelman, M.S., Kotukha, O.S., & Koval, I.M. (2018). General theory of state and law. Ternopil.

5. [5] Navrotskyi, V.O. (2011). On the relationship between the concepts of “criminal law” and “criminal legislation”. In Theoretical and applied problems of criminal law of Ukraine: Materials of the scientific conference with international participation (pp. 347-351). Luhansk: Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O. Didorenko.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3