Restriction of the right to information in the interests of national security: The problem of justification

Author:

Shynkar Tetiana

Abstract

The relevance of this study is conditioned upon the lack of a single theoretical justification for limiting the right to information, even though Ukrainian legislation allows such limitations in the Constitution. The purpose of this study was to analyse certain cases of restrictions on the right to information in the interests of national security and determine ways to justify such restrictions. The methodological framework of this study included the analysis of law enforcement practices concerning the restriction of the right to information. The study established that, despite a considerable theoretical basis in protection of human and civil rights and freedoms, the modern practice of administrative courts is based only on providing a legal assessment of the actions of the Security Service of Ukraine regarding the recognition of information and other activities of the subject of information relations as illegal in the light of the powers and advantages granted to the Service pursuant to Article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The absence of a single mechanism for restricting the right to information in the interests of national security was proved. The paper substantiated that the courts and state bodies of Ukraine, which are responsible for regulating information activities, have not yet developed their own ways and mechanisms for restricting the right to information, which would factor in their practice of providing a legal assessment of each of these cases. It was noted that the basic means of justifying the restriction of the right to information in the interests of national security, as well as any restriction of the right to information, is the use of a “three-part test”. The outlined grounds for localizing the right to information will be useful for scientists, law enforcement officers, and information security specialists for their legitimate application.

Publisher

Scientific Journals Publishing House

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3