Author:
Boettke Peter J.,Candela Rosolino A.
Abstract
What can we learn about applied price theory from the Bourgeois Era? In this paper, we contend there are three important lessons that can be extracted from McCloskey’s work on the Great Enrichment. First, transaction costs are not constraints, but objects of choice. Second, property rights are not merely a “bundle of sticks,” in that private property rights make exchange possible, but a culture of liberal ideas makes exchange viable. Third, ideas conducive to liberalism give rise to generalized increasing returns to the scope, rather than scale, of market exchange, which generated the Great Enrichment.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference32 articles.
1. Alchian, A. A. 1965. “Some Economics of Property Rights.” Il Politico 30 (4): 816 – 29.
2. Alchian, A. A. and H. Demsetz. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62 (5): 777 – 95.
3. Anderson, T. L. and G. D. Libecap. 2014. Environmental Markets: A Property Rights Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Boettke, P. J. and R. A. Candela. 2014. “Alchian, Buchanan, and Coase: A Neglected Branch of Chicago Price Theory.” Man and the Economy: The Journal of the Coase Society 1 (2): 189 – 208.
5. Boettke, P. J. and R. A. Candela. 2016. “A Combustible Combination: McCloskey on Ideas, Institutions, and Economic Performance through Time.” Faith & Economics 68: 41 – 5.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献