Affiliation:
1. 2FWO - Research Foundation Flanders, Brussels, BelgiumFrom: 1 Pain in Motion International Research Group, www.paininmotion.be; 2 Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium;
Abstract
Background: Pain, fatigue, and concentration difficulties are typical features of
chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The exact underlying mechanisms of these symptoms
are still unknown, but available evidence suggests an important role for impaired pain
modulation. As evidence also suggests that pain modulation is related to cardiovascular
mechanisms, it seems logical to investigate whether cerebral blood flow (CBF) and heart
rate variability (HRV) are altered in these patients.
Objectives: We aimed to investigate the role of the cardiovascular system in pain
modulation and symptoms of CFS; the response of CBF and HRV to physical stress
and their relation to the change in temporal summation (TS) of pressure pain and selfreported symptoms was evaluated.
Study Design: A controlled, randomized cross-over trial.
Setting: University Hospital Brussels.
Methods: Twenty CFS patients and 20 sedentary healthy controls were included in this
study. In both of the groups, the change in TS of pressure pain, CBF (using transcranial
Doppler), and HRV (using finger plethysmography) was examined during physical and
emotional stress (to control for potential bias), as well as their association mutually and
with self-reported symptoms of pain, fatigue, and concentrations difficulties.
Results: There was no significant interaction or group (F-values ranging from .100
to 1.862, P-values ranging from .754 to .181) effect in CBF or HRV parameters. HRV
and CBF did change during physical exercise, but the changes did not differ between
patients and controls. While pain scores during TS at the trapezius site reduced in
the control group after the physical exercise protocol (P = .037), they did not change
in the CFS group (P = .108), suggesting impaired pain modulation. There were no
significant correlations between CBF, HRV, TS, and self-reported symptoms (all P-values
of correlation analyses > .01).
Limitations: Although effect sizes were medium to large, the study sample was
relatively low. Also, the mild nature of the exercise bout is discussable. Nonetheless, this
mild exercise was able to provoke endogenous pain modulation in the control group,
which endorsed a proper execution of the cycling exercise. Moreover, mild exercises are
more applicable to daily physical activities in CFS patients than vigorous exercises.
Conclusion: These results seem to refute the previously suggested alterations of CBF/
HRV in CFS patients. These cardiovascular parameters appear not to explain pain before,
during, and following exercise.
Key words: Chronic pain, physical exercise, emotional stress, pain modulation,
cardiovascular systems, temporal summation, pain pressure thresholds, transcranial
Doppler, plethysmography
Publisher
American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine