Affiliation:
1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
Abstract
Background: Eighteen to 25% of patients after gynecological cancer treatment suffer from
lower limb lymphedema (LLL) that decreases the quality of life of gynecological cancer survivors.
Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB) is widely used in practice for the evaluation and
management of sympathetically mediated pain in the lower limbs. Several articles have suggested
that sympathetic ganglion block could be an effective treatment for lymphedema.
Objectives: To investigate the effect of LSGB on patients with secondary lymphedema related to
the treatment of gynecologic cancer, who do not respond to a conservative treatment.
Study Design: Prospective clinical study.
Setting: A single academic medical center, outpatient setting.
Methods: Eighteen patients with stage II lower limb lymphedema who did not response to the
conservative treatment were recruited. The patients underwent fluoroscopy-guided LSGB 3 times
at 2-week intervals. The circumference of the thigh and calf was measured in the upright position
at the first visit and 2 weeks after each session of LSGB. The pain score of the lower limb was
checked at the same time by a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10. The patients were asked
about their satisfaction with the procedure at the last follow-up visit. The Wilcoxon signed rank
test was used for data analysis. Significance was accepted at a P-value less than 0.05/3.
Results: The circumferences of affected thighs and calves decreased from 56.38 ± 4.77 and
35.33 ± 3.51cm to 54.42 ± 5.27 and 34.41 ± 3.35cm, respectively, in a significant manner after
3 consecutive LSGBs (P < 0.05/3). The maximal decrease after the third LSGB was 4 cm in the
thigh and 2cm in the calf. The pain score also showed a significant decrease after 3 consecutive
LSGBs from 2.17 to 1.28. The tightness and heaviness of the affected limb decreased after the first
LSGB in 15 patients (83.3%) and after the second LSGB in 2 patients (11.1%). Five of 18 patients
(27.8%) answered that the result of the LSGB met their expectations, 10 (55.6%) answered they
would undergo the same treatment for the same outcome, 2 (11.1%) answered they did not
improve as much as they had hoped, and they would not undergo the same treatment for the
same outcome, and only one patient (5.6%) answered the LSGB showed no effect.
Limitations: This study lacks a placebo control group and has only 18 patients. We did not
evaluate the quality of life of the patients.
Conclusion: We suggest that LSGB can be one of the treatment options for patients suffering
from LLL after gynecologic cancer treatment. Our result could provide a basis for a randomized
controlled trial in future investigations. The pain physicians can play an important role as one of
the multidisciplinary team for a comprehensive treatment of LLL.
Key words: Lumbar sympathetic ganglion block;gynecologic cancer;lymphedema
Publisher
American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献