Effects of Movement and Postural Positions in Spinal Cord Stimulation in the New Rechargeable Systems

Author:

Abejón David1

Affiliation:

1. 1Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; and Hospital Universitario Quirón, Madrid.Spain; 2 Medtronic Neuromodulación

Abstract

Background: Despite recent developments in implantable neurostimulation devices, the adjustment of stimulation levels to the patient’s postural changes has remained a problem so far. Objective: This study was conducted with the newest rechargeable devices, in order to compare its results with the ones published from conventional systems. Study Design: It is a prospective study. Setting: In 46 patients implanted with rechargeable constant current stimulation systems we measured impedance, stimulation thresholds, therapeutic range, as well patients’ satisfaction and sensation in 7 different body postures. Results: Data analysis was performed in 46 patients, whose most frequent pathologies were failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). The lowest amplitude needed to reach the different thresholds was always scored in the supine decubitus position, with no significant changes in the therapeutic range and impedance. For all stimulation thresholds, there is always a difference between the supine position and all other postures. No statistically significant differences with regard to patients’ satisfaction and sensation were found for the different postures. Limitations: Sample sample size. Conclusion: The findings of the present work are similar to those described in previous publications that showed the relationship between postural changes and several stimulation thresholds and pulse energy. The posture which requires lower energy — and whose corresponding therapeutic range (TR) is narrower — is supine decubitus. Key words: Spinal cord stimulation, change posture, rechargeable systems, sensor generation, threshold perception, threshold discomfort

Publisher

American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3