Abstract
Language is a magical key that human beings hold in their hands to open the door of communication. To succeed in communication, formal links are one of the aspects of language that need to be known and used in discourse in addition to the contextual factors (Cook, 1992). Hence, systematic exposure to them is essential for satisfactory language acquisition, and assessment should be in line with this as well. Consequently, this study aimed to reveal whether a national exam English as a foreign language (EFL) learners take include these links. Based on this purpose, English texts taking place in a national high school exam (LGS) held in Turkey annually were analyzed by the discourse analytical framework of formal links suggested by Cook (1992) as a part of the qualitative design. The analysis indicated that the types of formal links included in the exam were found to be verb forms, parallelism, referring expressions, repetition, ellipsis, and conjunction. Moreover, outnumbering uses of verb forms and referring expressions and lack of substitution were revealed. In the light of these findings, high school EFL teachers and the material developers in the ministry were suggested to include different types of formal links in their lessons/materials so that students could internalize such aspects of language at early stages of their EFL learning process and be one step closer to a balanced acquisition process.
Publisher
Sakarya University Journal of Education
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference12 articles.
1. Adiantika, H. N. (2015). Cohesive devices in EFL students’ expository writing. ENGLISH REVIEW: Journal of English Education, 4(1), 94-102.
2. Atar, C. (2017). Recipient design in students’ speaking and writing: Some practical suggestions for pedagogy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(8), 108-120.
3. Bahaziq, A. (2016). Cohesive devices in written discourse: A discourse analysis of a student’s essay writing. English Language Teaching, 9(7), 112-119.
4. Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.
5. Cook, G. (1992). Discourse (3rd Ed.). Oxford University Press.