Affiliation:
1. SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ANABİLİM DALI
2. SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ
Abstract
This research aims to examine the relationships between teachers' earthquake knowledge levels and sustainable earthquake awareness levels. A relational survey model with a quantitative research method was chosen for the research. The research group consists of 255 teachers, 166 women, and 89 men, working in private and public institutions in Kocaeli province in the 2022-2023 academic year. The research group was determined by convenient sampling, one of the purposeful sampling methods, and the "Sustainable Earthquake Awareness Scale" and "Earthquake Knowledge Level Scale" were used as data collection tools. The data of the research were analyzed in a particular statistical program using quantitative methods. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that teachers' sustainable earthquake awareness levels did not differ according to their gender and age, and while their earthquake knowledge levels did not differ according to their gender, they did vary according to their age. Additionally, it was observed that there was a positive relationship between teachers' earthquake knowledge levels and sustainable earthquake awareness levels.
Publisher
Sakarya University Journal of Education
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference28 articles.
1. Aydın, F. (2010). Primary school eighth-grade students' perception of the concept of "earthquake": A phenomenographic analysis. Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature oath History of Turkish or Turkic, 5(3), 801–817. Retrieved from: https://academicjournals.org/journal/SRE/article-full-text-pdf/B03FB8719272.pdf
2. Baştürk, S ., & Taştepe, M. (2013). Population and sample. Scientific Research Methods, Ankara: Vize Publishing, 129, 159. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322341862_Basturk_S_ve_Tastepe_M_2013_Evren_ve_orneklem_S_Basturk_Ed_Bilimsel_Arastirma_Yontemleri_sf_129-159_Ankara_Vize_Yayincilik
3. Blutndell, D. J. (1981). Earthquake hazard and risk mitigation. Contemporary Physics, 22(3), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107518108231535
4. Değirmençay, Ş. A., & Cin M. (2016). Earthquake education research in Turkey: Descriptive content analysis. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Education Journal, 13(1), 301-314. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yyuefd/issue/25853/272550
5. Ertuğrul, B., & Ünal, SD (2020). Determination of general disaster preparedness belief levels of students studying at a foundation university health services vocational school. Journal of Disaster and Risk, 3(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.653911